So long as it is founded on assumption (read “axiom”) as opposed to model construction (see Skolem’s work), math is just religion….and religion is no more than a venue for working out who should be in charge, who should prosper economically, who should have access to resources, who should be allowed to publish, etc.
Read…
https://math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/Readers/HowManyAngels/Cantor/Cantor.html
…and for those who think “that time has passed” I recommend you take notice of works like “Subject with No Object” by J. P. Burgess. Platonism (read “religion”), and a sense of the need to defend it, is alive and well in the mathematical community.
You might call me an anti-realist deconstructionist, a pantheist, monist, atheist, amateur …or any other epithet you like. Better pull up the ladder, Mr. Wittgenstein, the Siths are about to attack.
“Only a Sith deals in absolutes.” https://www.starwars.com/news/8-great-obi-wan-kenobi-quotes