The Stern-Brocot Tree

The Stern-Brocot Tree starts with “virtual vertices” (labeled 0/1 and 1/0 below) appended to the basic binary tree structure… Labels are constructed/assigned via a “mediant” process…add the numerators and denominators of the vertices on each side above the vertex… The fact that we can use information from only the previous row without reference to anyContinue reading “The Stern-Brocot Tree”

The Beginning

The title of this blog entry: in as much as it assumes there is such a “thing” as a beginning it assumes a certain relationship between the discrete and the continuous. Which comes “first”, discrete or continuous, how do they relate? Does the discrete “generate” the continuous as in parent/child?…or is there a “smooth” transition,Continue reading “The Beginning”

How we put Humpty back together again

Read the previous blog post Towers of Hanoi, then answer the question,” how many cuts does it take to divide a strip of paper into 4 parts, 8 parts, 16 parts?” Likewise, how many jumps does it take to get from the first entry in our lists of code to the last entry? Answer: obviously,Continue reading “How we put Humpty back together again”

Towers of Hanoi

Check out this link to the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences… https://oeis.org/A000975 There you will find all kinds of info related to the sequence 2,5,10,22,42,85,170,341,… The sequence is related to the discrete derivative/Gray’s coding that is the output of the DD tree. When examined closely the transformation of the order of the binary coding foundContinue reading “Towers of Hanoi”

Math and Religion (or….math is religion)

So long as it is founded on assumption (read “axiom”) as opposed to model construction (see Skolem’s work), math is just religion….and religion is no more than a venue for working out who should be in charge, who should prosper economically, who should have access to resources, who should be allowed to publish, etc. Read…Continue reading “Math and Religion (or….math is religion)”

A bit of Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

What appears below is copied from Section 2. at this link… https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/axiom-choice/ …closely related to the idea of an infinitesimal…less than any rational number, but not equal to 0. “…a countable collection of pairs of sets of real numbers fails to have a choice function”…….Let’s think about that… Cosets in R/Q+ determined by a pairContinue reading “A bit of Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy”