Collatz Proof

Consider the positive integers in base 2, in binary notation. Define prefix: the digits left of the first pair (from the right) of identical digits along with the left digit of that pair. Define tail: the digits to the right of the prefix. Define the Collatz function: Consider the positive integers in binary in countingContinue reading “Collatz Proof”

The ultimate Nietzsche

“Truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are” An apt description of what is at work when mathematicians are in ‘Platonic’ mode…when foundations that in fact are not solid are deemed sufficiently so. A quote: According to Weyl 1946, “Brouwer made it clear, as I think beyond any doubt,Continue reading “The ultimate Nietzsche”

Count and Measure

• There is only one certainty: There is no such thing as a perfectly impermeable boundary (all are conditional, porous) • Sharkovskii’s ordering of N as an example of a porous boundary: an infinity of infinities • The BITXOR/discrete derivative completely changes the order type of the set of infinite binary strings • A favoriteContinue reading “Count and Measure”

Mathematics is social

Mathematics is social The extent to which that people can ‘get through life’ without mathematics is an indication of its artificiality. Granted, most of those people rely on technology invented or built by others who may ‘get through life’ using more (or less) mathematics. Still, it is clear that “meaning is use” in anything involvingContinue reading “Mathematics is social”

Set theory, models, and Skolem

Models of ‘Reality’ References: ‘Mathematical Undecidables, Metaphysical Realism, and Equivalent Descriptions’, Hartry Field ‘The Gibbs Paradox’, E T Jaynes The whole discussion of set theory, models and reality on pages 8 and 9 of the first reference is best understood the way E T Jaynes deals with entropy in his work referenced above, in sectionContinue reading “Set theory, models, and Skolem”

Wants and Needs

Wants and Needs One of the weaknesses of capitalism as a means to satisfy ‘wants’ is that instead of satisfying ’wants’ it clearly by its very motivation ends up creating more ‘wants’ in an endless cycle. Thus, if we put ‘wants’ before ‘needs’, then ’needs’, though limited, will never be satisfied. ‘Wants’ are in everyContinue reading “Wants and Needs”