Indeterminate

…and a ‘refutation’https://blog.gruffdavies.com/2017/12/24/newtonian-physics-is-deterministic-sorry-norton/ …notice it states as part of his argument that “Newton’s laws are deterministic, but they’re not complete.” (boundary with holes) and in that his argument against Norton fails: Norton is essentially claiming that ‘incompleteness’ and ‘indeterminate’ are equivalent….Norton is dealing with the idea of ‘boundaries’ without using the word. If you readContinue reading “Indeterminate”

How fundamental is complementation?

What is infinite except that which is NOT finite? To ignore the role of the complement (ignore its absolutely foundational role…the only absolute: there is no absolute) is to ignore everything related to it…including the infinite. Therein is the contradiction in the whole of “Cantor’s Garden”. It ignores the “orthogonal” point of view for whichContinue reading “How fundamental is complementation?”

The Infinite Truth Table

The last input column of the infinite truth table (one with an infinite number of rows and columns) is given by …010101010101… Its first column consists of two infinite strings…one all 0’s and the other all 1’s. Each subsequent column has twice as many strings of 0’s and 1’s concatenated such that they alternate. EveryContinue reading “The Infinite Truth Table”

The handoff

A measurement amounts to a determination that a handoff of information is possible…if so, the handoff happens…without fail…as in the behavior of a particle in a potential …the trajectory is that of least action. The limiting features that determine possibilities for handoff are clock frequency and relative bit size ….scale (gear mesh model…pitch of theContinue reading “The handoff”

Can we “axiomatize” our way to R?

If the purported constructions fail, and they do, can we just set up an axiomatic structure that gives us all of the structure in the current theory of the real numbers? No. The theory of complete ordered fields is only decidable with the operations addition and multiplication. As soon as exponents and trigonometric functions areContinue reading “Can we “axiomatize” our way to R?”

The Cauchy Criterion vs Dedekind “gaps”

Question… In the current theory of the real numbers does there exist a pair of distinct rational numbers between which there is NOT an infinite number of irrationals? No. How then does a “cut” of Q (the rationals) determine a unique irrational number? Usual answer: The sqrt2 “cuts” the rationals into two sets: those whoseContinue reading “The Cauchy Criterion vs Dedekind “gaps””